Companies have long hoped to make money from this freely available software by charging customers for support and add-on features. Some have succeeded. Many others have failed or will falter, and their ranks may swell as the economy worsens. This will require many to adopt a new mindset, viewing open source more as a means than an end in itself.Umm... Duh.
- Open Source: The Model Is Broken
Let's look at a couple of the premises of Open Source.
- Open Source code is higher quality
- Anyone can modify it
- The more successful the software it, the larger the community.
- Give software away for free
- Charge for support
- Charge for custom development
What sucks here is that I like open source. And to make something sustainable, you have to be able to make money off of it. I don't know how to do that. The original author might, but he just spent two pages not telling us.
3 comments:
Maybe you are not able to live entirely off of open source software, but I guess that companies can save some time and money because of the "like sharing a pizza" effect if they contribute code.
If you write code for an active open source project, and your code is merged to the main branch, you can be sure (at least for a while) that what you wrote will be compatible with the latest version of the software. More people will also test your additions, so it is not impossible that you will get free help finding and possibly fixing bugs.
GPL does not stops you from get paid about your software. You just have to deliver the source, and also BSD.
Contracts don't automatically go to the lowest bidder. They go to the bidder whom the client feels is both most competent to do the necessary work, and who is not charging an unreasonable amount. Business pays for competence (usually, even if the competence is only perceived).
And who is more competent than the people who actually created the software? Nobody, that's who.
Post a Comment